2011 Team Recruiting Rankings

These are the current and team composite rankings for 2011.   The composite rank is created from all  available public information on each team and player.  Rather than use just one ranking system, which provides more error and bias, I put them all together in a weighted formula (based on mathematically proven value).  This provides balance and fairness for services that over rank and/or under rank teams and players.

The CFBMatrix model does this to try and reduce evaluator bias and reduce errors in team rank calculations.  It improves our predictor numbers and provides the most fair and balances team recruiting ranking in the country.

2011 FBS Team Recruiting Ranking

Rank                             Team                                                            Conference                   Composite Score

1 Florida State ACC – A 1.41
2 Alabama SEC W 3.23
3 Texas Big 12 3.77
4 Auburn SEC W 4.23
5 USC PAC-12 S 4.41
6 Georgia SEC E 6
7 Ohio State Big Ten – Ldrs 6.59
8 LSU SEC W 7.95
9 Notre Dame Indep 8.59
10 Clemson ACC – A 9.64
11 Tennessee SEC E 11.77
12 Oregon PAC-12 N 12.54
13 Oklahoma Big 12 14.05
14 Florida SEC E 14.28
15 California PAC-12 N 15.77
16 South Carolina SEC E 16.26
17 North Carolina ACC – C 16.46
18 Nebraska Big Ten  – Lgnds 18.46
19 Arkansas SEC W 19.64
20 Mississippi SEC W 21.54
21 Stanford PAC-12 N 21.64
22 Texas Tech Big 12 22.06
23 Washington PAC-12 N 22.31
24 Oklahoma State Big 12 24.23
25 Virginia ACC – C 23.92
26 Michigan Big Ten  – Lgnds 25.44
27 TCU MWC 27.36
28 Iowa Big Ten  – Lgnds 28.67
29 Michigan State Big Ten  – Lgnds 30.18
30 Louisville Big East 30.84
31 Texas A&M Big 12 30.93
32 Rutgers Big East 31.23
33 Penn State Big Ten – Ldrs 32.92
34 Miami (Fl) ACC – C 34.43
35 Kansas Big 12 35.46
36 Illinois Big Ten – Ldrs 35.61
37 Virginia Tech ACC – C 36.23
38 Boston College ACC – A 38.08
39 Wisconsin Big Ten – Ldrs 38.77
40 Georgia Tech ACC – C 40.46
41 Kentucky SEC E 41.82
42 Utah PAC-12 S 42.85
43 Mississippi State SEC W 44.21
44 Cincinnati Big East 46.03
45 Baylor Big 12 47.95
46 UCLA PAC-12 S 48.1
47 West Virginia Big East 48.28
48 Oregon State PAC-12 N 48.82
49 Marshall Conf USA 49.66
50 SMU Conf USA 50.31
51 Missouri Big 12 50.78
52 UCF Conf USA 52.67
53 Maryland ACC – A 53.46
54 Vanderbilt SEC E 55.72
55 South Florida Big East 57.41
56 Syracuse Big East 57.46
57 Pittsburgh Big East 58.05
58 Northwestern Big Ten  – Lgnds 59.96
59 Arizona PAC-12 S 60.53
60 Minnesota Big Ten  – Lgnds 60.72
61 Indiana Big Ten – Ldrs 61.18
62 Kansas State Big 12 61.49
63 Washington State PAC-12 N 63.11
64 Memphis Conf USA 65.27
65 North Carolina State ACC – A 66.56
66 Duke ACC – C 67.32
67 Houston Conf USA 68.21
68 Colorado PAC-12 S 68.64
69 Southern Miss Conf USA 69.59
70 Iowa State Big 12 70.21
71 Tulsa Conf USA 71.36
72 Boise State MWC 72.38
73 BYU Indep 72.49
74 Arizona State PAC-12 S 74.89
75 Western Kentucky Sun Belt 76.05
76 East Carolina Conf USA 76.54
77 Colorado State MWC 76.67
78 San Diego State MWC 77.2
79 Louisiana Tech WAC 77.89
80 Toledo MAC 78.56
81 Rice Conf USA 80.18
82 Wake Forest ACC – A 81.09
83 Purdue Big Ten – Ldrs 83.3
84 Central Michigan MAC 85.64
85 UAB Conf USA 86.06
86 FIU #N/A 86.69
87 Hawaii WAC 87.06
88 Wyoming MWC 88
89 Ohio MAC 89.47
90 Air Force MWC 90
91 Connecticut Big East 91.05
92 Louisiana-Lafayette #N/A 92.83
93 Bowling Green MAC 93.46
94 Utah State WAC 93.67
95 Navy Indep 94
96 UNLV MWC 95.69
97 Tulane Conf USA 96.25
98 Northern Illinois MAC 97.62
99 Akron MAC 97.85
100 Middle Tennessee Sun Belt 98.12
101 Arkansas State Sun Belt 98.62
102 Fresno State WAC 100.33
103 San Jose State WAC 100.79
104 New Mexico MWC 101.32
105 Nevada WAC 103.23
106 Troy Sun Belt 103.38
107 Temple MAC 103.62
108 Army Indep 104.5
109 ULM Sun Belt 105.38
110 Idaho WAC 108.08
111 North Texas Sun Belt 108.48
112 Florida Atlantic Sun Belt 109.99
113 UTEP Conf USA 111.46
114 Miami (Oh) MAC 111.73
115 Buffalo MAC 113.23
116 Western Michigan MAC 113.31
117 Ball State MAC 114.18
118 Eastern Michigan MAC 115.33
119 New Mexico State WAC 116.05
120 Kent State MAC 118.05

Leave a comment